| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ali.G
Joined: 15 Oct 2003
Posts: 180
Location: ..................?
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:38 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Punk Rooster wrote: | We are all in this together!!! - Ben Lee
Is that a proposition for group sex?  |
Now Now, Cheeky Punky - behave!!!  
_________________
NAFC - 2005 & 2006 Reserves Premiers (back to back)!
Stanley H Lewis Memorial Trophy Winners 2005 & 2006!
SANFL Club of the Year 2006 & 2007 ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
statsman
Joined: 17 Oct 2003
Posts: 371
Location: With RobRooster on the Mbrs side - smelling distance from Snag Sandwiches
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I might not totally understand the criteria but surely player's success at non-South Australian teams are not valid for his inclusion into a South Australian HoF? As much as I want the Jars bros. in it Fud's Hawthorn success has nothing to do with South Australian footy! For instance, would Ben Hart or Ricciuto be nominated despite only playing a handful of games in the SANFL (with limited personal success) or can they get in for their Crows efforts??
I agree Nitschke should be in for his tremondous effort in the late 1800s...
_________________
May the NORTH be with you
Statsman |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wedgie
Drunky the Clown
Joined: 14 Oct 2003
Posts: 9420
Location: Drunk
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| statsman wrote: | I might not totally understand the criteria but surely player's success at non-South Australian teams are not valid for his inclusion into a South Australian HoF? As much as I want the Jars bros. in it Fud's Hawthorn success has nothing to do with South Australian footy! For instance, would Ben Hart or Ricciuto be nominated despite only playing a handful of games in the SANFL (with limited personal success) or can they get in for their Crows efforts??
I agree Nitschke should be in for his tremondous effort in the late 1800s... |
I disagree, if someone's played for Hawthorn, Auckland or Bagdad its all about as relevent as playing for the Cows or Port as far as SA Footy goes for true SA Footy fans.
Rehn only played something like 24 games for West and got in, an absolute disgrace IMHO.
Im sure him dragging West down from a finals contender to bottom of the heap wouldn't/shouldn't have helped his case.
At least Bradley and Jarman played a lot more games than that for their SANFL clubs.
Jarman's games for Hawthorn were no less relevent than his games for the Cows IMHO.
BUT having said that it has a very loose description, ie the SA Footy Hall of Fame so I would assume if someone was born here and played 103 games for the Iceland Vikings they'd probably be eligble.
An absolute waste of time, there should be a SANFL hall of fame and nothing else.
Victoria don't have the need to create their own hall of fame for Victorian players only. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ian
Joined: 15 Oct 2003
Posts: 4553
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| statsman wrote: | I might not totally understand the criteria but surely player's success at non-South Australian teams are not valid for his inclusion into a South Australian HoF? As much as I want the Jars bros. in it Fud's Hawthorn success has nothing to do with South Australian footy!
|
Totaly agree, I thought it was SANFL, but his career at North didn't even get a mention in the paper  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wedgie
Drunky the Clown
Joined: 14 Oct 2003
Posts: 9420
Location: Drunk
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ian wrote: | | statsman wrote: | I might not totally understand the criteria but surely player's success at non-South Australian teams are not valid for his inclusion into a South Australian HoF? As much as I want the Jars bros. in it Fud's Hawthorn success has nothing to do with South Australian footy!
|
Totaly agree, I thought it was SANFL, but his career at North didn't even get a mention in the paper |
Nup you thought wrong, its the SA Football Hall of Fame.
Nothing to do with the SANFL unfortunately (and wrongly IMHO). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RobRooster
Joined: 15 Oct 2003
Posts: 1094
Location: Where my ashes will lay (Prozzie)
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Although the criteria of getting into the SA Football Hall of Fame seem strange I find it hard that Andrew Newton Jarman isn't
inducted as yet 
As I find it S.Rehn in there with limited time (how many games) 
Well done Fud - what a career - what a player 
_________________
Its A Great Great Club and the Club we Love !!
We're the good ole RED and WHITES !!
NORTH FOREVER ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wedgie
Drunky the Clown
Joined: 14 Oct 2003
Posts: 9420
Location: Drunk
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RobRooster wrote: | Although the criteria of getting into the SA Football Hall of Fame seem strange I find it hard that Andrew Newton Jarman isn't
inducted as yet
As I find it S.Rehn in there with limited time (how many games)
Well done Fud - what a career - what a player |
Its because of the loose criteria that you've got to be out of the game for 3 years, apparantley being a coach isn't out of the game but being an assistant coach is. Mickey mouse stuff really. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
